IBUSHICommission

The appraisal · 見立て

We are asked about forty houses a year.
We take four.

Mitate 見立て is the word a physician uses for a diagnosis and a carpenter uses for reading a building. It is not a valuation and it is not a survey for a bank. It is one question, answered in a day on site: is this frame worth another two hundred years of somebody's life?

Most of the time the answer is no, and the useful thing we can do for an owner is say so quickly and for a fixed fee, rather than slowly and for a percentage. The four tests below are the whole standard. We have not held anything back to keep the decision ours.

A master carpenter in working clothes stands in an empty long-abandoned farmhouse with one flat hand against the great central pillar, head tilted, reading the timber. Daylight falls through a hole in the roof; fallen thatch and dust lie across the floorboards, and the massive frame overhead is intact.
Ōno Sōhachi at the daikokubashira of a house near Furukawa, empty since 2009. Sound to the core. We took it.

The four tests · 四つの見極め

A frame either carries another two hundred years, or it does not.

  1. The frame

    Pre-war, and cut by hand.

    We are looking for a frame jointed without nails — mortice, tenon and wedge — in timber taken from one valley. Post-1950 houses are dimensioned lumber on a plan drawn elsewhere, and there is nothing in them a carpenter can save that could not be bought new for less.

    Fails on Sawn stock, bolted plates, or a frame under seventy years old.

  2. The great pillar

    The daikokubashira sound to the core.

    One post carries the argument of the whole house. We sound it, we cut a small plug from its foot where the damp would have got in first, and we look at what comes out. A hollow heart at the base means the house has been drinking for twenty years and the frame around it has been quietly redistributing load ever since.

    Fails on Rot at the foot, or a pillar already sistered with steel.

  3. The roof

    Re-thatchable, not merely replaceable.

    The thatch itself is expected to be finished — it is a wearing surface and thirty years is a life. What must survive is the structure beneath it: the rafters, the tie-beams, and the lashings. If the ridge has broken and folded, the tie-beams have usually gone with it, and at that point we are not restoring a roof, we are building one on top of a souvenir.

    Fails on A broken ridge, or rafters carrying more rot than load.

  4. The fire

    Somebody will light it.

    This is not sentiment and it is not negotiable. A minka is preserved by its own smoke; a house restored and then left cold is a house we will be asked to rescue again inside thirty years. We ask who will live here, how often, and whether they understand that an open hearth means smoke in the room. A holiday let opened four weekends a year fails this test, and it is the test most often failed.

    Fails on Nobody in residence, or an owner who wants the look without the fire.


What we decline · 断り

Saying no is most of the work.

Thirty-six houses a year get a written answer that Ibushi is the wrong workshop for them. It is not a soft letter. It says what we found, which of the four tests it failed, what it would cost to proceed anyway, and what we think the owner should do instead — which is sometimes a demolition contractor and sometimes another trade entirely.

We do this because the alternative is worse. An owner who is told a frame can be saved when it cannot spends two years and a great deal of money discovering it by other means. And a workshop of eleven people that takes on a house it cannot honestly finish is a workshop that will finish nothing else that year.

There is one more reason, and it is the least comfortable. Every kominka we take is one we can point at afterwards. If we take a house that was never going to carry, the finished building argues against everything on this site.

A thatched farmhouse past saving on a clear winter morning: the ridge broken and the roof folded inward, thatch collapsed into the interior, a gable wall leaning out, a corner post off its foundation stone.
Declined on test 03. When the ridge folds it takes the tie-beams, and what is left is not a roof with a problem — it is a pile with a shape.

How it runs · 段取り
  1. You write

    Where the house is, roughly when it was built if you know, and how long it has been empty. Photographs of the roof from outside and of the largest post you can find inside are worth more than any description.

  2. We answer within the week

    Sometimes the answer is already no, from the photographs, and we will not charge for that. Sometimes it is a date.

  3. One day on site

    The tōryō and one carpenter. We sound the frame, plug the pillar, go into the roof, and open one section of floor. It is a physical inspection and it leaves small, repairable marks.

  4. A written verdict

    Within three weeks: the four tests answered one by one, the frame drawn as we found it, and either a range for the work or the reasons we are declining. Yours to keep and to show to anyone.